Thursday, July 1, 2010

Channel Islands Park Officials Warn of Great White Sharks

By Zeke Barlow, Ventura County Star
June 30, 2010

Great white sharks find their way to the waters off the Central Coast every summer to birth their young, but this year they are making their presence known as they attack seals and wash up on beaches.

The National Park Service on Wednesday issued a warning to swimmers off Santa Barbara Island after sea lions were recently attacked by great white sharks on three different occasions. That follows a great white sighting off East Beach in Santa Barbara last weekend, prompting officials to keep the kids in the Junior Lifeguard program on the beach on Monday and Tuesday.

A great white pup was found dead on Rincon Beach last weekend. On Sunday, a man posted video of himself on YouTube helping a young beached shark back into the water near Rincon that was either a great white or salmon shark.

But while the sharks may be more visible this year, their summer stint along the coast is part of their natural cycle, said Michael Domeier, president of the Marine Conservation Science Institute and the lead scientist on the current National Geographic show, “Expedition Great White.”

“This is the time of year that mature pregnant females come into the shallow areas of Southern California to give birth,” Domeier said. “It’s not surprising to have some of the adult females looking for food at the same time of year.”

And adult great whites love nothing more than a fat sea lion or elephant seal, which are abundant in the Channel Islands. A full grown shark may eat about three pinnipeds a week, said Jeff Graham, a fish biologist at the Scripps Institute of Oceanography.

Witnesses saw the Santa Barbara Island attacks, one of which occurred in the landing area that is a popular snorkeling spot with island visitors. People are advised to enter the water at their own risk, officials with the Channel Islands National Park said Tuesday.

“Any time there is a great white in the water, there is the potential danger, so we want people to be aware of it,” said park spokeswoman Yvonne Menard.

Domeier said while the sharks may be here every year, attacks on humans are still very rare. “I would not tell people they need to worry,” he said.

Graham said the best thing to do is to stay away from an area where they have been spotted. Still, he added that it is unknown how long a shark will stay in an area after it has eaten.

For most of the year, the great whites prefer deeper, colder water than is found off the Ventura County coast, but the area is popular in the summer to pup their young, Domeier said.

The mothers give birth to about six to eight pups at a time, which are about 40 pounds and 3 feet long at birth. The pups like water that is about 100 to 200 feet deep so they can feed on fish, which are more abundant than in deeper waters.

Domeier said the sharks probably stay in the area for the first few years of life.

“The juveniles remain here, but they are harmless,” he said.

Before long, they head to an area between the mainland and Hawaii known as “the cafe.” What they are doing in the middle of the ocean, where food is more scarce, is a mystery, he said.

Attacks on humans are very rare. Since the 1920s, there have been 11 fatalities in the state from shark bites, according to California Department of Fish and Game. Though a man was killed off Solona Beach in 2008, only 20 of the 95 shark attacks over the past 57 years have occurred south of Point Conception, according to Fish and Game.

It is thought that great white populations worldwide are declining, Domeier said, but he acknowledged it is difficult to estimate their numbers because they are so elusive.

Classrooms or Prison Cells?

 










State spending on prisons has been growing and eating away at other priorities, like higher education. Now that’s beginning to change.

By Pat Wingert, Newsweek
June 28, 2010

Faced with a $19 billion budget deficit this spring, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger announced that he was taking a cleaver to state health and welfare programs for the poor, the disabled, and the elderly. And rather than removing another slice from the state’s vaunted higher education system—which had already experienced years of reductions in state aid, ensuing tuition hikes, and student protests in response—budget cutters took more than $1 billion out of the state corrections programs, particularly prison health care.

It may seem odd that state funding for college kids often competes with money for prisoners, but if you track spending in California over the past 30 years, you’ll see evidence of a long-standing tug of war between these two very different constituencies. Over much of the past decade, funding for corrections has gone steadily up, while spending on state colleges has tumbled. “The state seems to be saying we have more of a future in prisons than in universities,” University of California president Mark Yudof said in a recent speech.

Following months of protests by students, parents, and colleges, Schwarzenegger urged the California legislature to pass a constitutional amendment earlier this year that would require the state to spend more on college classrooms than prison cells. “What does it say about any state that focuses more on prison uniforms than on caps and gowns?” Schwarzenegger said, adding that “30 years ago, 10 percent of the general fund went to higher education and 3 percent went to prisons. Today, almost 11 percent goes to prisons and only 7.5 percent goes to higher education. Spending 45 percent more on prisons than universities is no way to proceed into the future.” The state’s priorities, he added, “have become out of whack.”

While his proposal hasn’t succeeded in securing serious political traction, Schwarzenegger’s words are clearly having an impact on voters. When the Public Policy Institute of California recently conducted a poll asking where state government should be trimmed, most respondents said no to more cuts for higher education, and overwhelmingly said yes to trimming the corrections budget. But maybe that was because all the talk about prisons versus colleges confused voters, says Thad Kousser, an associate professor of political science at UC San Diego. The PPI study also found that 49 percent of those polled had the mistaken impression that California was spending more on corrections than anything else. “Prisons are not this mammoth thing that is eating up the rest of the budget,” he says.

The 11 percent that California is spending on corrections is higher than the national state average of 7 percent, and the Golden State’s university system is one of the most extensive in the country. So it may not be surprising that nowhere else in the country is the faceoff between prisons and higher education so stark. However, it is also true that 30 states have already slashed their higher-education budgets in response to recessionary pressure, and there’s every reason to think more cuts will be coming. (A recent report by the National Governors Association [NGA] predicts that states may not regain their fiscal footing until the end of decade.)

Most states have a commission or committee looking for ways to reduce their budgets, and there’s not much maneuvering room, partly because of rising corrections and health-care costs. Those two, says John Thomasian, director of the NGA’s Center for Best Practices, are “sucking the wind out of any discretionary funding” states had. Most states spend most of their money on K–12 education, but that’s also the least popular place to cut, he says.

As a result, higher education is the budget item that ends up being particularly vulnerable. “When times are good, states put more money into it, because they know it’s their economic engine,” says Thomasian. “But there is no constitutional requirement to fund higher ed.” Governors and legislatures know that they can “let tuition make up the difference” so they treat their state colleges and universities as “a fiscal balance wheel,” acknowledges Terry Hartle of the American Council on Education. It doesn’t help, adds Thomasian, that many state leaders think university systems aren’t managed as efficiently as they should be. “They are not viewed as one of the most productive areas of our economy,” he says. “More money doesn’t produce better students or higher graduation rates.”

But that doesn’t mean that there isn’t pressure building in many states to find smarter ways to cut corrections costs. In California, for instance, two thirds of state-prison admissions are related to technical parole violations, Thomasian says. Yet research shows that parole compliance is better when convicts are hit with immediate sanctions (like a weekend in a local jail) than if they are eventually sent back to prison. Electronic monitoring devices, which restrict convicts’ geographic movements, are also getting more consideration. Both ideas require more state investment in parole and probation supervision, but in the long run, Thomasian says, they will save money and lives. “When people are behind bars, they are not paying child support or paying taxes,” he says. “It’s also a fact that after someone spends two years in prison, they are lost, even if they came in as a nonviolent offender. Total immersion in that kind of culture leaves its mark.”

Imprisonment is also very expensive. In California, the cost of keeping an inmate behind bars for a year is about $52,000, similar to the cost of tuition, room, and board at Stanford University. Among the reasons for that high price tag: California has the best-paid prison guards in the country and their union’s political muscle has helped ensure that corrections jobs kept growing over the past three decades. As the state budget crisis has escalated, however, there’s been more of a push by reformers to consider ways to whittle down the prison population by reducing sentences, easing penalties for parole violations, or releasing some prisoners (particularly the elderly and sick) early. But experts say such proposals are politically risky.

“Politicians are well aware of the political price to be paid if someone they let out early goes on to commit a serious crime,” UCSD’s Kousser says. “You can have an overall 99.9 percent success rate, but one person re-offends, and it can become a political nightmare for anyone who backed it.” The recent Chelsea King murder has reignited the debate in California over proposals to change tough sentencing laws.

As a professor at a public university himself, Kousser says he’d like nothing better than to see corrections costs shrink and higher education funding rise, but he doesn’t think it’s politically feasible to cut corrections drastically—at least not in a state like California that has a “huge law and order vote.” The bottom line, says Kousser, is that “no one wants to overspend on prisons, but people expect the state to make their safety a top priority.”

Ultimately, it may not make much sense to link spending on higher education and money allocated for corrections. “Inmates and students both tend to be young, and like colleges, prisons are residential facilities, but I’m not sure it makes sense to compare them,” says Hartle. “No reasonable person would disagree that spending money on education is a more constructive, lifelong investment. But just like everyone else, I also want every criminal who might harm me or my family to be locked up.”

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Journal 5: All Aboard?—California's High Speed Rail



In 2008, California voters approved Proposition 1A, which allocated $9.95 billion to the California High-Speed Rail Authority for the construction of state-wide high-speed rail (HSR) system. When completed, HSR promises to dramatically alter transportation options in the state:
  • Sacramento to San Francisco: 284 miles in under 2 hours; $40 one-way
  • Sacramento to Los Angeles: 412 miles in under 2.5 hours; $53 one-way
  • San Francisco to Los Angeles: 432 miles in under 3 hours, $55 one-way
  • San Francisco to Bakersfield: 284 miles in under 2 hours; $43 one-way
  • San Francisco to San Diego: 616 miles in 4 hours; $70 one-way
  • San Jose to Anaheim: 429 miles in 2.5 hours; $54 one-way
  • San Jose to San Diego: 567 miles in 3.5 hours; $66 one-way
  • Los Angeles to San Diego: 167 miles in under 1.5 hours; $30 one-way
Though the proposition passed, and significant state and federal funds are secured, HSR's future is still somewhat dubious. Lawsuits have been filed over everything from environmental impact reports to the placement of rail routes. Environmentalist groups have sought changes in routes to lessen the impact on sensitive areas, while transportation advocates fear HSR will draw away funds from traditional transportation systems, such as trains and buses. In the Bay Area, a coalition of peninsula interests, including the cities of Menlo Park and Atherton, have sued the state hoping to stop the project altogether, fearing, in part, that rail lines will divide their affluent neighborhoods. And, of course, the state's perpetual budget woes continue to loom over the project, set to begin construction in Southern California in 2012. Californians are equally enthusiastic and pessimistic about the project. They are delighted at the prospects of traveling so quickly and efficiently, yet they lack faith in Sacramento to complete such a massive endeavor. How does HSP illustrate both everything that is right in the state and everything that is wrong? In a decade's time, do you believe this system be a reality? Why or why not?

Requirements:
  • MLA format
  • 2 pages minimum
Due: Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

Monday, June 28, 2010

Expository Analysis Assignment



Answer one of the two following prompts:

A) What is the function of loyalty in Farewell to Manzanar? For example, how do characters decide who they are loyal to and when? Why is a person's loyalty of particular importance during the time of Japanese internment? Analyze issues of loyalty in Farewell to Manzanar. Cite specific evidence from the book.

B) Describe the family's relocation home of Manzanar. As portrayed in the book, what does Manzanar sound like, smell like, look like, etc.? How does it stand in contrast to other locations in the book? Explore the primary setting of Farewell to Manzanar. Cite specific evidence from the book.

Requirements:
  • MLA format, including parenthetical citation
  • 2.5-page minimum
The best papers:
  • Stay within the parameters of the subject matter
  • Have a concise thesis which clearly outlines a position
  • Clearly support the thesis with solid evidence and a logical structure, citing specific passages from Farewell to Manzanar
  • Conclude with a summation of the argument
  • Properly cite evidence using MLA's parenthetical citation method
  • Are in compliance with MLA Style
Due: Wednesday, June 30th

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Week Four: San Diego


Mission Bay

I never saw the morning 'til I stayed up all night
I never saw the sunshine 'til you turned out the light
I never saw my hometown until I stayed away too long
I never heard the melody, until I needed a song.

—Tom Waits, "San Diego Serenade"

Week 4
M 6.28
READ
FM: 128-188

IN-CLASS
Reading discussion; Presentations (Farris, Brandon); Preview—Expository essay

DUE
Journal 4

W 6.30
READ
eR: “The Conservative Case for Gay Marriage” by Theodore B. Olson, “Same-Sex Marriage: ‘A Basic Civil Right’” by James Rotondi, “Same-Sex Marriage: Losing a Battle, Winning the War” by Andrew Cohen, “Stupidity, Gay Marriage, and the Evolution of Religion” by Dan Agin, “Why I Fought for the Right to Say ‘I Do’” by Greta Christina, “An Argument For Same-Sex Marriage: An Interview with Jonathan Rauch” by David Masci

IN-CLASS
Reading discussion; Presentations (Matt, Kyler)

DUE
Expository essay

UPCOMING:

Week 5
M 7.5
NO CLASS

W 7.7
READ
eR: “Why One Queer Person is Not Celebrating California's Historic Gay Marriage Decision” by Mattilda Bernstein Sycamore, “Preserve Traditional Marriage for Benefit of Future Generations” by Roger Crouse, “The Worst Thing About Gay Marriage” by Sam Shulman, “We Don't Need Gay Marriage” by Mark Vernon, “Sex and Consequences” by Peter Wood, “An Argument Against Same-Sex Marriage: An Interview with Rick Santorum” by David Masci

IN-CLASS
Lecture—Rhetoric 101; Reading discussion; Presentations; Preview—Persuasive essay

DUE
Journal 5